Build alignment and drive consensus across membership ecosystems
Associations, federations, coalitions, and networks depend on the engagement of their members. Yet members differ in priorities, expectations, and levels of involvement. What matters to one group may be irrelevant to another.
Strategic initiatives stall when these differences remain implicit. SOLV structures member intelligence so organisations can move forward while preserving trust and avoiding internal friction.
Most organisations rely on CRM systems. These are useful for administration, but they mainly record what already happened.
They don't provide a continuous, forward-looking view of shifting priorities, emerging concerns, or collective readiness for new initiatives.
SOLV builds a digital twin of your membership ecosystem.
Member priorities, concerns, positions, and relationships are continuously mapped into a living intelligence model. This allows organisations to understand not only individual members, but also clusters, coalitions, and collective dynamics.
Positions and preferences evolve as new data enters, keeping community intelligence current rather than frozen at a point in time.
SOLV processes public information, internal data, and structured member input. Profiles are continuously updated and can be reviewed and enriched by members themselves.
This creates a consultable view of who cares about what, where alignment exists, and where friction may emerge, supporting more focused engagement and better-prepared interactions.
KEY PLATFORM OUTPUTS
Continuously updated profiles capturing priorities, concerns, preferences, and internal differences within member organisations.
What are Company X's current priorities, and how have they shifted since last year?
How do the priorities of our SME members compare to those of our corporate members?
Which members have we not heard from in six months?
Organisation-wide view of dominant themes, trends, and engagement levels across the community.
What topics are gaining traction across the membership right now?
How does sentiment on the energy transition differ between large and small members?
Which issues are rising in urgency compared to last quarter?
Visibility into coalitions, alignments, and tension lines between members and clusters.
Which members are most aligned with each other on regulatory reform?
Where are the fault lines if we push forward on the sustainability charter?
Who are the connectors that bridge different clusters in the network?
Estimated acceptance of planned initiatives, suggested alternatives where support is limited, and automatically generated meeting preparation notes.
What level of support can we expect for this policy position across the membership?
If we adjust the timeline, does that shift the acceptance among mid-sized members?
What should we know before the meeting with Company Y on Thursday?